DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SJN
Docket No:
Oo
on
“WH
ao ~]
!
D «
1
oO
NO wh
6 July 2015
pear
This is in reference to your reconsideration request submitted
through the Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, Marine Corps
Installations West-Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California.
You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our
letter of 20 May 1994, that your application had been denied.
Additionally, you petitioned the Board for reconsideration of
your case and were advised in our letter of 23 October 1997,
that your request had been denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 12 June 2015. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application and any material submitted in support of your
request.
You presented as evidence, various letters requesting assistance
for injuries you alleged occurred while on active duty, anda
medical narrative summary covering the period from 6 to 12 July
1982. Although some of the evidence you presented is new, it is
not material given your pattern of misconduct. Accordingly, your
reconsideration request is denied.
It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such
that the Board will not process any additional reviews and this
matter is considered a final action. However, if you wish to
continue to seek relief you will need to present your concerns to
a court of appropriate jurisdiction.
Sincerpel
c . . ‘NELLL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5361 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case Eile. After careful and conscientious consideration of the enti record, the Board determined the letter from the Depart Veterans Affairs stating you are being treated for s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10499 14
You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of li December 2012, that your application had been denied. Your current request nas been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6139 14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice, Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAO, SUITE tool ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2390 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 18 March 2015. material submitted in support of your application, and your husband’s prior case file. husband’s mental disorder, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6179 14
This request was denied on 30 September 2013. #, three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 22 January 2015. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04072-00
You again request that this fitness report be removed, and you add a new request for consideration by a special selection board for promotion to lieutenant colonel. petitioner alleges that senior officers, career counselors, and at least one monitor, him of fair consideration for command, promotion, and school selection. record and FYOl 0 and Subsequently, he Senior fitness requests removal of In our opinion, removing the petitioned report would have 3. significantly increased the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9227 14
Your current request has been considered by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your statement that your discharge should be recharacterized pursuant to Presidential Proclamation (PP 4313),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR6702 15_Redacted
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 August 2015. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12510 14
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. In the absence of sufficiently material evidence for reconsideration, the decision of the Board is final, and your only recourse would be to initiate action, at no cost to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8231 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.